The current web calculator for electronic stopping powers exploits a) the "SRIM Module.exe" (with an upper energy limit of 5 GeV/amu) included in SRIM 2013 code (SRIM Tutorials) - whose maximum available energy is 10 GeV/amu -, i.e., the used electronic stopping power tables are those provided by "SRIM Module.exe" code with a low energy limit of 1 eV; and b) the energy-loss equation (i.e., Eq. (2.18) in Sect. 2.1.1 of [Leroy and Rancoita (2016)]) as discussed here. The overall approach is referred to as *SR-treatment framework.*

The following link give access to the Web Applications for the calculation of the residual spectral fluence or residual energy for protons and ions traversing an absorber:

### How to use this Calculator for particle spectral fluences or mono-energetic particles traversing an absorber

For an incoming particle spectral fluence or mono-energetic particles, this tool allows one to calculate the residual spectral fluence or residual energy after traversing a shielding material.

The input parameters and options for the tool are described below. When the input form has been completed, pressing the "CALCULATE" button will start the calculation and open the "Results" page (allow for pop-up in your browser settings). The result page will be also linked at the bottom of the calculator page.

### Input Parameters:

- Input type

- Incident particle

- Target material

- Traversed path

- Number of steps

- Particle spectral fluence.

### Input type

In the web Calculator, using the selector at the top of th calculator panel, the user can select the calculation of the residual spectral fluence or the residual energy for incoming protons or ions.

Spectral fluence is the default option:

User has to change selection for mono-energetic particles:

### Incident Particle

In the web Calculator, using the pull down menu, the user can select the species of incident particles, i.e., protons or any other elemental ions.

Except for proton and alpha particle masses, the user can also modify the mass (in amu) of the incident particle (e.g., for all isotopes one can refer to this page): the default mass is that of the most abundant isotope (MAI). Further information are available at the following webpage.

### Target Material

In the section "Target Selection" it is possible to specify an **User Defined** target material or a predefined **Compound** material. User can also select the target as **gas**, this is allowed only for single element and natural gas target (H, He, N, O, F, Ne, Cl, Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn).

The stopping power in target gases is usually higher than that in an equivalent solid target. The Gas/ Solid correction disappears for higher velocity ions with energies above 2 MeV/amu. But at lower velocities the effect can be quite large - almost a 2 times change in stopping bacause of the Phase effect near the Bohr velocity, 25 keV/amu.

in the User Defined section individual elements can be selected as well as the composition of the target material choosing the number of elements in the compound. The required parameters for each element are:

- Atomic number (Z)/Chemical symbol

- Stoichiometric index or element fraction

*Electronic Stopping Power for User Defined Compounds*

Electronic Stopping Power for User Defined Compounds can be determined by means of Bragg's additivity rule, i.e., the overall Electronic Stopping Power in units of MeV cm^{2}/g (i.e., the mass electronic stopping power) is obtained as a weighted sum in which each material contributes proportionally to the fraction of its atomic weight. For instance, in case of a GaAs medium ones obtains (e.g., Eq. (2.20) at page 15 in [ICRUM (1993)]):

where and *A*_{Ga} [*A*_{As}] are the Electronic Stopping Power (in units of MeV cm^{2}/g) and the atomic weight of Gallium [Arsenic], respectively.

As discussed in SRIM. (see help of "The Stopping and Range in Compounds" in SRIM-2013), the Compound Correction is usually zero for compounds containing heavy atoms, Al(Z>=13) or greater. All experiments with compounds such as Al_{2}O_{3}, SiO_{2}, Fe_{2}O_{3}, Fe_{3}O_{4}, SiC, Si_{3}N_{4}, ZnO, and many more, show less than 2% deviation from Bragg's additivity rule which estimates the stopping by the sum of the stopping in the elemental constituents. That is, the stopping in Al_{2}O_{3} is the same as the sum of the stopping in 2 Al + 3 O target atoms. For these compounds there is no need for a Compound Correction. This correction should be accounted for in compounds containing mostly H, C, N, O and F for ion stopping below 2 MeV per atomic mass unit and is negligible above 5 MeV per atomic mass unit. In the current calculator, no correction is applied for target atoms lighter than Al. Further details are available at SRIM Compound, and SRIM Compound Theory.

*Predefined compounds*

In the Compoud section it is possible to select a predefined compound including the SRIM compound corrections in the stopping power calculation.

For instance, in the following plot, it is shown the percentage difference of the stopping power of H_{2}O (selected as User Defined material) and Water_Liquid (selected as a Compound) as a function of the incoming proton energy in MeV:

### Traversed Path

This input define the traversed path by a particle fluence. The traversed path is expressed in [g cm^{-2}] ad is given by:

(absorber thickness in cm) x (absorber density in g cm^{-3}) .

The lower limit of traversed path is equivalent to about 5 μm of Si (1.16x10^{-3} [g cm^{-2}]), e.g., 0.96 cm in Dry Air at sea level with density equal to 1.20484x10^{-3} g/cm^{3} (as implemented in SRIM from ICRU-37 table 5.5).

### Number of Steps

In the web Calculator, using the pull down menu, the user can select the number of steps of the calculation - i.e., the traversed path is divided by the number of the steps.

The results of each steps is used as input for the following one to obtain the final result for the total traversed path.

In each step, the minimum traversed path is equivalent to about 5 μm of Si (1.16x10^{-3} [g cm^{-2}]), e.g., 0.96 cm in Dry Air at sea level with density equal to 1.20484x10^{-3} g/cm^{3} (as implemented in SRIM from ICRU-37 table 5.5). The number of steps will be accordingly modified to keep each step above the minimum.

### Particle Spectral Fluence

This section define the points of the spectral fluence as a function of energy.

The input format is one point per line (Energy - Flux , separated by a space or tab); it is also possible to copy and paste values. The minimum value of the particle spectral fluence is 1 keV.

### Mono-Energetic Particle

This section define the list of energy of the incoming protons or ions.

The input format is one energy per line; it is also possible to copy and paste values. The minimum value of the particle energy is 1 keV.

### Result

The result page contains the graph of the input spectral fluence and the spectral fluence after traversing the absorber. The table provides the values of the spectral fluence (above 1 keV) and the residual spectral fluence (above 1 keV) after traversing the absorber. In addition, the incoming and residual spectral fluences are provided. In case of mono-energetic particles a table with the incoming energy and residual energy is provided.

Residual energies were obtained disregarding multiple scattering effect, i.e., directions of flight of emerging particles were unchaged with respect to those of impinging directions.

### Extension for high energy particles

As discussed in this webpage the mass electronic stopping power is derived at sufficiently high energies by mean of energy-loss equation (i.e., Eq. (2.18) in Sect. 2.1.1 of [Leroy and Rancoita (2016)]) while, at low energies, SRIM treatment has to be employed.

**Electronic stopping power for single elements.**

For every ions passing through any elemental medium up top uranium - with the exception of *Z* = 85 and *Z* = 87 for which no data are avalable to account the density effect -, the transition energy at which the SRIM treatment is replaced by that employing Eq. (2.18) (from Sect. 2.1.1 of [Leroy and Rancoita (2016)]) is such that i) protons and ions (from He up to U) are considered almost fully-ionized and the term accounting for the non-participation of inner electrons of the medium (with atomic number *Z*) in the collision loss process is negligible (as discussed in this web page), ii) difference among the mass electronic stopping powers (derived foloowing the two approaches) typically does not exceed 5%.

In Figure 3, It is shown the percentage difference among the two approaches at the upper limit of the chosen transition energy range, for every incident ion in each elemental target. The overall average difference for every ions in every target is 2% (± 1.4%). The worst case (5.41 ±0.38%) occours for incident ions with *z* = 91, the best case (0.34 ±0.33%) for for incident ions with *z* = 34.

Figure 3. Percentage difference between SRIM and *energy-loss equation* at the upper limit of the transition energy range, for every incident ion in each elemental target . The mass of the incoming particle corresponds to that of the most aboundant isotope.

In Figures 4 (protons in silicon medium) and 5 (iron-ions in silcon medium) , the so finally mass electronic stopping powers within sr-niel frameworth are shown together with the corresponding SRIM curve.

Figure 4. Mass electronic stopping power as a function of energy for protons in Silicon. **Black solid curve** is SR-NIEL treatment, **red dashed curve** is SRIM calculation.

Figure 5. Mass electronic stopping power as a function of energy for Fe ions in Silicon. **Black solid curve** is SR-NIEL treatment, **red dashed curve** is SRIM calculation.

**Electronic stopping power for compounds**

For every ions passing through a compound reported here, the electronic stopping power is derived means of the SRIM treatment at low energies and bty that from SR-framework at high energies, similarly to what already discussed for elemental media. For few compounds belonging to the ICRU list the parameters employed for the energy loss formula (including those for the densiity effect) are reported in Table II of Sternheimer et al. (1984).

In Figure 6, It is shown the percentage difference among the two approaches at the upper limit of the chosen transition energy range, for every incident ion in each of compound media (see compound list webpage). The overall average difference for every ions in every target is 2.25% (± 1.24%). The worst case (4.81 ±0.91%) occours for incident ions with = 91, the best case (0.65 ±0.95%) for incident ions with = 1. In about 0.3% of all possible combinations among incident particles and compound media, such a percentage difference exceeds the value of 7%. In those cases, only the electronic stopping power from SRIM is availble.

Figure 6. Percentage difference between SRIM and energy-loss equation at the upper limit of the transition energy range, for every incident ion in each of compound media: the compound number is provived in the compound list webpage. The mass of the incoming particle corresponds to the one of the most aboundant isotope

In Figures 7 (protons in propane medium) and 8 (iron-ions in propane medium) , the so finally mass electronic stopping powers within sr-niel frameworth are shown together with the corresponding SRIM curve.

Figure 7. Mass electronic stopping power as a function of energy for protons in Propane. **Black solid curve** is SR-NIEL treatment, **red dashed curve** is SRIM calculation.

Figure 8. Mass electronic stopping power as a function of energy for Fe ions in Propane. **Black solid curve** is SR-NIEL treatment, **red dashed curve** is SRIM calculation.